Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
i like to learn more. can you explain my observations.
so the knot cannot be used because the large knot is not static and is changeable or too common for this type of glove? the 3 bumps on web that I circled cannot be used since all glove would make the same bump. are these discounted or invalid matching areas?
you know more than i know on this subject.
-
Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
This is a stylematch and nothing more. End of discussion.Leave a comment:
-
-
Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
I am sure you saw it on mlb auctions, but in case you didnt, there is a pirates throwback milledge up until the 29thLeave a comment:
-
Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
The inside "fur" don't know its actual name, but it appears that the ends come up (loose) on the glove in the photo and mine is loose on the ends. Again, I don't know if it is enough to go on.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
Kyle knows more than I do on this. Can you use the knot on the glove as a matching spot? looks like the same knot and same length on the area tied.
Also there are three bumps of the web area too. i circle probably in the worst color - green. but maybe all glove of this style have this protrusion of the leather in those areas.Attached FilesLeave a comment:
-
-
Re: Photomatch on "grail"?
Only looks like a style-match IMO. There is nothing to actually match except for the fact that it's the same model glove, so there's no proof really to call it a photomatch.Leave a comment:
-
Photomatch on "grail"?
I have been looking for so many pictures to try to match this glove. THis is the best quality and detailed picture I can get of the glove during in-game use. I have come across pictures that look like a possibility, but this is my best bet. I can only assume it is the glove because of the fact that I believe he only had one glove during the season or so. Anyway, any help/opions are greatly appreciated. Thanks
Leave a comment: