Photomatch on "grail"?

[LastingsMilledge85]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

The wool comes up in my glove regardless if a hand is put in or not. I'll see if I can get a better view of my glove to get the same angle that is in the picture. Thanks for the help guys.

[LastingsMilledge85]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

[zookerman182]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

looks like a match to me, going off all of the fine points everyone else has commented on. Nice glove!

[LastingsMilledge85]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

Thanks so much for the help. I would love to be able to photomatch everything in my collection, but that really just is not possible. Let me ask this tough, if an item has an MLB holo and is dated to a game is that considered a photomatch if there is only one for that game (i.e. a jersey)?

[joelsabi]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

great chance to practice on photo matching. thanks.

[LastingsMilledge85]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

So I guess we can conclude that it is the same glove? Thanks joelsalbi for the parts you pointed out, never noticed them.

[joelsabi]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

So I guess we can conclude that it is the same glove? Thanks joelsalbi for the parts you pointed out, never noticed them.

STLHAMMER32 made some great observations too.

[LastingsMilledge85]

Re: Photomatch on "grail"?

True. What if it had a MLB holo and was dated to that game. If the pics didn't match, but the MLB holo says it was used in that game, then would that be it despite any strange markings on the piece of equipment to confirm it for sure?