Re: Vintage Authentics & Lou Lampson
Howard is absolutely correct and at least in this instance regarding the green St. Pats Ripken that is my understanding of what happened. Since this jersey was purchased by Dan through another private collector not through an auction, what is the recourse here since Lampson is inexcessible? In this type of situation which I am sure happens quite often, where items are bought and sold multiple times through private deals, how does one ultimately trace the sale back to the auction house and directly to Lampson?
Besides that fact, the bottom line is this in the green jersey controversy; The evidence that this jersey was not game used was sent directly to Lou and he never, ever responded. What kind of way to operate is that? Admit you made a mistake and make it right. At least in this particular situation where Lampson does not work independently for his own company, it seems like there is no way to address errors that are uncovered several years after a jersey is authenticated. Trying to backtrack through several years in which a jersey has changed hands multiple times and as Howard pointed out having no receipt directly through the auction house would prove to be a very timeconsuming and almost impossible situation. There seems to simply be no reason why some type of direct contact information is provided for Lampson. If this type of arrangement is not addressed we will continue to see this very type of problem going forward. A collector will buy something authenticated by Lou through an auction house, the item may sell and change hands privately over the course of five or so years and then something is uncovered that is questionable about the item. What is the person currently holding the item to do at that point? Howard is correct, contact info. for Lou Lampson should be provided on his LOA's period. If he wants to be in this business then stand behind what you authenticate and address problems as they occur.
Brett Herman
Howard is absolutely correct and at least in this instance regarding the green St. Pats Ripken that is my understanding of what happened. Since this jersey was purchased by Dan through another private collector not through an auction, what is the recourse here since Lampson is inexcessible? In this type of situation which I am sure happens quite often, where items are bought and sold multiple times through private deals, how does one ultimately trace the sale back to the auction house and directly to Lampson?
Besides that fact, the bottom line is this in the green jersey controversy; The evidence that this jersey was not game used was sent directly to Lou and he never, ever responded. What kind of way to operate is that? Admit you made a mistake and make it right. At least in this particular situation where Lampson does not work independently for his own company, it seems like there is no way to address errors that are uncovered several years after a jersey is authenticated. Trying to backtrack through several years in which a jersey has changed hands multiple times and as Howard pointed out having no receipt directly through the auction house would prove to be a very timeconsuming and almost impossible situation. There seems to simply be no reason why some type of direct contact information is provided for Lampson. If this type of arrangement is not addressed we will continue to see this very type of problem going forward. A collector will buy something authenticated by Lou through an auction house, the item may sell and change hands privately over the course of five or so years and then something is uncovered that is questionable about the item. What is the person currently holding the item to do at that point? Howard is correct, contact info. for Lou Lampson should be provided on his LOA's period. If he wants to be in this business then stand behind what you authenticate and address problems as they occur.
Brett Herman
Comment