HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • earlywynnfan
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    How about we bring this thread back with the original purpose?? I'm sure you guys have some items from these two, esp. Alomar. I have a couple of bats of his, plus a game worn jersey that he wore versus KC one year.

    For Blyleven, I have the signed lineup and batting cards from his 200th win, and what I feel is the best auto'd Blyleven ball out there. It's covered with stats on 3 lobes; he did this without me even asking at a show in Pittsburgh a few years ago. He seemed impressed because I told him I drove all the way from Cleveland to see him. He convieniently left the 4th panel blank, which I had hand-painted.

    Ken
    earlywynnfan5@hotmail.com
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • 5kRunner
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by Mark17
    It's either you or Retrosheet.org:



    1973, 1979, 1981, 1985, 1989
    I think those are just the games he actually played in. He was an all star '72, '75, & '77 as well.

    Check out the latest Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Rookie Status & More of Nolan Ryan. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, draft status, bats, throws, school and more on Baseball-reference.com

    Leave a comment:


  • Fnazxc0114
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Im glad to see blyleven get in

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark17
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by 5kRunner
    Unless I can't count. Nolan Ryan was an All Star 8 times.
    It's either you or Retrosheet.org:



    1973, 1979, 1981, 1985, 1989

    Leave a comment:


  • 5kRunner
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by Mark17
    Using that logic, maybe Nolan Ryan shouldn't be in the Hall then, since he played in just 5 All Star games in his 27 year career.
    Unless I can't count. Nolan Ryan was an All Star 8 times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark17
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by kellsox
    In the case of Blyleven the amount of all star appearances are telling because pitchers are not picked by fans

    Using that logic, maybe Nolan Ryan shouldn't be in the Hall then, since he played in just 5 All Star games in his 27 year career.

    Leave a comment:


  • kellsox
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    In the case of Blyleven the amount of all star appearances are telling because pitchers are not picked by fans

    Leave a comment:


  • xpress34
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    I'm just going to say this on the 'All-Star' scale that everyone seems to want to throw around... rating on a guy (especially current players) on how many All-Star games they make is a joke, since fans have voted for them since 1970.

    Fans vote for who is POPULAR - not who deserves to go. This was really highlighted last year when Jimmy Rollins was in the lead for SS in the NL despite having only played in 12 games due to injuries.

    Most fans who vote pay no attention to actual stats and simply vote because they like a player, so the players's shouldn't be punished in their HOF selection because of FAN voting.

    Even GOLD GLOVES won is becoming a popularity contest and is no longer based on what it was intended to be based on - the players DEFENSE. Examples? How about a guy being discussed in another thread - Rafael Palmeiro winning the Gold Glove at 1st after only playing like a 1/4 of the season there? Another? I'll use Jimmy Rollins again. In 2007 Troy Tulowitzki had the HIGHEST Fielding % of ANY player in the Majors. Not just SS and not just NL, but every position in both leagues. Why didn't he win the GG? Because the writers said, "A Rookie has NEVER won the Gold Glove and a Rookie won't win it this year either". When asked why Rollins won it, there was a comment made about his HRs and such... when did OFFENSIVE numbers contribute to a DEFENSIVE award? Give him the Silver Slugger, but Tulo should have had the GG.

    Sorry for the rant, but I get a little worked up when awards/honors that are now just popularity contests are used to rate players on their careers.

    To put it all in perspective - Dick Allen was one of (if not the best) 1B of his era - and a multi time All-Star - and he's not in the HOF. Why? Because he didn't like the press (i.e. BWAA) and they paid him back in kind but not giving him the votes.

    - Smitty

    Leave a comment:


  • 5kRunner
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Alomar is a hall of famer in my book. He was probably the best 2b in baseball for a decade.

    I've always been on the fence about Blyleven. I agree his career stats seem to make hime a hall of famer. The strikeouts and shutouts are impressive. But the one stat I can't seem to turn away from is that he was an all-star only twice. A legit hall of fame in my mind should be a fixture on the all-star team. But, I don't vote, so who cares. He's a hall of famer now.

    Congrats to them both.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark17
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by Dewey2007
    I guess I just didn't see him pitch enough but to me he was just very good over a long period of time. I just don't think of greatness when I think of Blyleven's career. I don't think you can say he was the dominant pitcher of his era or even a top 5 guy really. But who am I to say. He got in and that's all that counts. He's been waiting a long time for this so you have to be happy for the guy.
    Define "dominant." The most dominating thing a pitcher can do to a batter is to strikle him out. The most dominating thing a pitcher can do to a team (besides no-hitting them, which Bert did once) is shut them out.

    Bert ranks 5th all-time in strikeouts (3701) and ninth all-time in shutouts (60).

    The shutouts ranking is particularly impressive because of all the pitchers who broke into the big leagues since 1942, the leaders are Ryan (61), Seaver (61), and Bert (60.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob L
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    BTW, I was hoping this would be a "show your Alomar and Blyleven GU items" thread. The moderators need to move this to the General Sports Discussion forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob L
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by kellsox
    Longevity doesn't equal greatness( although it can). In blyleven's case it shows the ability to pitch consistently and avoid career/perfomance ending injury. In 22 seasons He made 2 all-star teams, finished in the top 10 in cy young voting 4 times and won 20 games 1 time. That doesnt seem like someone who is deserving of being honored as one of baseballs all time greats.
    I think his W-L record would have been much better if he hadn't been on crappy teams the majority of his career. Hell, The Big Train would have blown Cy Youngs win record out of the water if the Senators were remotely decent during his time. Too be really shallow, his strike out total deserves the moniker of "great".

    Leave a comment:


  • Sincityson
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    To appreciate Alomar, one had to see him play day in & day out. His fielding skills as a second baseman were incredible.

    Originally posted by BaseballGM
    I hope this is sarcasm. If not, you must not have seen him play from 1990-2000.

    Leave a comment:


  • ahuff
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    You can use this to see how Blyleven stacks up against other great/future HOF players. I was shocked to see how close he was to Maddux in many of the categories.

    Leave a comment:


  • kellsox
    replied
    Re: HOF Day - Alomar and Blyleven

    Originally posted by mbrieve
    He was only 17 wins away from being a 300 Wins and 3000 K's guy. Also, isn't longevity a sign of greatness and almost a prerequisite for the HOF? There are a lot of guys that had great 8-10 year careers and then injuries catch up with them.
    Longevity doesn't equal greatness( although it can). In blyleven's case it shows the ability to pitch consistently and avoid career/perfomance ending injury. In 22 seasons He made 2 all-star teams, finished in the top 10 in cy young voting 4 times and won 20 games 1 time. That doesnt seem like someone who is deserving of being honored as one of baseballs all time greats.

    Leave a comment:

Working...