Here we go again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roady
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by marino13
    Maybe you can blame on Steiner for handling the jersey -- here is the video of them doing!


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwrxd5vfj_c
    I have to admit, I laughed out loud.

    Leave a comment:


  • marino13
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Maybe you can blame on Steiner for handling the jersey -- here is the video of them doing!


    Leave a comment:


  • marino13
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by trsent
    Michael, don't you speak English because I have no idea what you are trying to say. Are you now accusing the seller of spilling a milkshake on the jersey? I don't understand your comment. It looks like something Jason Edelman would have written with that smiley face (or 10) after it.

    All I know is the jersey appears to be the same jersey from Grey Flannel that I posted so I'm not sure what the point of continuing is unless you are really just trying to stir the pot up.

    Did you every email your concerns to the seller and receive a reply?

    Ha!

    Would rather deal with people selling GU on Craigslist before I deal with a KNOWN fraudster! I wouldnt even touch this jersey with a ten foot pole.


    Milk shake is bad English for Harlem shake... lmfao!


    The pot is NOT need to be stirred up since history speak for itself, like the title stated "Here we go again!"

    Leave a comment:


  • ousooner_85
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    From what I've read in past threads about this seller, I wouldn't waste time with is stuff other than to warn others, if so inclined.

    The sticker is in a different place for whatever reason, otherwise the jersey appears to be the same as it was from Grey Flannel. Something like this wouldn't be a deal breaker on an item for me normally but given the sellers history..............to each his own going forward.

    Leave a comment:


  • trsent
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by marino13
    Did you ask how bad was the handling that cause the hologram not only slid over and a couple deep heavy creases?


    Or just maybe, the hologram wants to follow with the current trend. It is doing the "harlem shake"?
    Michael, don't you speak English because I have no idea what you are trying to say. Are you now accusing the seller of spilling a milkshake on the jersey? I don't understand your comment. It looks like something Jason Edelman would have written with that smiley face (or 10) after it.

    All I know is the jersey appears to be the same jersey from Grey Flannel that I posted so I'm not sure what the point of continuing is unless you are really just trying to stir the pot up.

    Did you every email your concerns to the seller and receive a reply?

    Leave a comment:


  • slab0meat
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    It's certainly possible it moved (see my post above).. no idea about creases or whatever, but those holograms don't always stick very well.

    Leave a comment:


  • marino13
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by earlywynnfan
    The pinstripes seem to match up to my eye, I cannot see how they are different jerseys. The seller claims the hologram "slid over" during handling. How is this possible??

    Ken
    Did you ask how bad was the handling that cause the hologram not only slid over and a couple deep heavy creases?


    Or just maybe, the hologram wants to follow with the current trend. It is doing the "harlem shake"?

    Leave a comment:


  • ChuckFoPrez
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by trsent
    Ken, who knows? Nice to hear the jerseys match-up. Can't imagine how a hologram would slide over, but whatever, at least the jersey appears original.
    It's entirely possible for that to happen, the adhesive on the back can break down due to heat and age and become this real sticky glue-like substance that the sticker can effectively float on and move with relative ease. That said, there should be a residue trail from the original point of placement if this were the case.

    Just my $0.02

    Leave a comment:


  • trsent
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by earlywynnfan
    The pinstripes seem to match up to my eye, I cannot see how they are different jerseys. The seller claims the hologram "slid over" during handling. How is this possible??

    Ken
    Ken, who knows? Nice to hear the jerseys match-up. Can't imagine how a hologram would slide over, but whatever, at least the jersey appears original.

    Leave a comment:


  • earlywynnfan
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    The pinstripes seem to match up to my eye, I cannot see how they are different jerseys. The seller claims the hologram "slid over" during handling. How is this possible??

    Ken

    Leave a comment:


  • trsent
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    I just don't get what is altered about the Steiner tag. Someone says it moved from one listing to another? I'm very confused what the issue is. Does anyone have any proof this jersey isn't the same jersey from the Grey Flannel listing to the eBay listing?

    Leave a comment:


  • astros5.7
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    To be clear, I am not defending the seller, a quick search would tell most people to stay clear of his auctions given his past.

    My main point is that having a hole punched in the tag doesn't mean that it is a blank. I have shown several examples of people having game worn and issued jerseys that have the hole punched in the wash tag.

    Leave a comment:


  • cliffjmp33
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    I don't have any clue either way about legitimacy, so I won't even wager a comment.

    However, I noticed the seller, masauction, and I remember that name being mentioned before in previous posts. I think it may be worth time to read previous comments about that seller.

    Leave a comment:


  • marino13
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    Originally posted by trsent
    not being a respectable person playing by the rules of common decency.

    hmmm, this description qualify to a lot of newly release prisoner or the convicted by his fellow peers.


    And this statement DOES NOT meant for the seller -- it is for:

    "Walk like a duck, quack like a duck, have ducklings telling observers it's a a chicken .... IT AINT A F***KING CHICKEN




    And just a side thought, while you defend this jersey (could careless about the seller) -- I guess, this your jersey?

    Leave a comment:


  • marino13
    replied
    Re: Here we go again

    The steiner hologram has been tampered with -- how would anyone explained the multiple creases on a not so easy creased hologram?

    Only logical answer -- it was creased during the removal process!


    Now, if the letter is available, no one would question but I still would with the multiples deep creases on the hologram.


    As for copy MLB hologram, I never stated that the seller copied it and so forth. What I said was I have encountered in person at a convention --- a random seller has game used jersey with copied MLB hologram tag! After letting the seller knows the discrepancy, the jersey was removed from display. What happen to it -- I DONT CARE. It just shocked me at that moment that it actually happened!


    Now I guess, we have "blank" and "issued" situation -- they both have hole-punch in the tag. How would you know which is which IF the letter LOA is not available?

    Leave a comment:

Working...