A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roady
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by beaglegypsy003
    Just wondering. By having a game ball, bat or anything else game-used autographed lower its value? There shouldn't be a difference since it is altered from its original state.
    According to most of the auctions I have witnessed over the years it raises the value.

    Leave a comment:


  • beaglegypsy003
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Just wondering. By having a game ball, bat or anything else game-used autographed lower its value? There shouldn't be a difference since it is altered from its original state.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roady
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by seanbaseball
    Im looking at my clothing different now. I have a closet full of Works of art!!!!!
    If you sign them you will have to trow them in the garbage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roady
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by seanbaseball
    Artists

    Leave a comment:


  • Roady
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by slats7
    of course they're works of art. who do you think designs them? janitors? more like graphic artists. and you can't call a Babe Ruth jersey "mass produced" when there's like two of them in existence.
    Gear down a notch Hoss. Nobody is saying Babe Ruth jerseys are mass produced.

    Let me try again since I obviously was not clear in my meaning.

    The modern day jerseys are mass produced.

    Leave a comment:


  • woodward30
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by Chess2899
    I helped an old man clean out his attic. He noted that some stuff in there belonged to his grandfather. Before too long, he stumbled on a 1927 game used Babe Ruth uniform. It had a bold Babe Ruth signature on it, "To my good buddy!, Babe Ruth". The old man asked me if I wanted it. I said no, the signature ruined the originality of the 1927 New York Yankee uniform. I don't like damaged goods! The old man responded, "OK, thought I would ask anyway. There is this nice man named Ken Goldin who has called a few times looking for baseball stuff. Maybe, I can get him to pick up all this junk for $20."
    Well, that's just a silly example. There's a difference between the monetary value of a historical item and the collecting value of the piece to an individual. Of course I would buy an under-valued (monetarily speaking) jersey with a signature on it and flip it for a profit. I would never keep a jersey with a signature on it though. The jersey just loses all of its collecting value to me if it has been altered like that. And in regards to possibly removing the signature, I still would not accept the jersey for my collection. Sure, to the naked eye, the jersey appears original. However, the jersey has still been altered from its original form (which could be confirmed through means such as light table analysis). Again, it's a matter of preference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil316
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Frail = Grail

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil316
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    The worst is when you find a frail item and it is signed to the person. Totally a bummer unless you happen to have the same name.

    Leave a comment:


  • icollectDCsports
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    I'm not in favor of getting game worn jerseys signed. There are different opinions on this subject, obviously. For those who can't resist getting jerseys auto'd, I'd recommend having them signed down by the tags. This leaves the upper portion of the jersey (the part that was visible while worn) the way it was while in use while still allowing for the personalization and authentication that some desire.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chess2899
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Subway employees are also looked upon as "artists".

    Leave a comment:


  • seanbaseball
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Artists
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • seanbaseball
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Im looking at my clothing different now. I have a closet full of Works of art!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • ferro39
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    there are plenty of people who can remove the autogragph for a fairly nominal fee

    Leave a comment:


  • slats7
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by Roady
    It's not a work of art. It is a piece of clothing mass produced in a factory.

    And the Mona Lisa is boring. Maybe a mustache would make her smile.
    of course they're works of art. who do you think designs them? janitors? more like graphic artists. and you can't call a Babe Ruth jersey "mass produced" when there's like two of them in existence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roady
    replied
    Re: A gorgeous jersey ruined for me at least

    Originally posted by Chess2899
    I helped an old man clean out his attic. He noted that some stuff in there belonged to his grandfather. Before too long, he stumbled on a 1927 game used Babe Ruth uniform. It had a bold Babe Ruth signature on it, "To my good buddy!, Babe Ruth". The old man asked me if I wanted it. I said no, the signature ruined the originality of the 1927 New York Yankee uniform. I don't like damaged goods! The old man responded, "OK, thought I would ask anyway. There is this nice man named Ken Goldin who has called a few times looking for baseball stuff. Maybe, I can get him to pick up all this junk for $20."
    Throw it in the garbage it has a signature on it!

    Leave a comment:

Working...