Re: Another "find" of possible Game Used Memorabilia (3 items)
I guess I asked for it by posting. However, I found the response absolutely hilarious, particularly the point counterpoint stuff. It amazes me that a simple summary can be dissected so thoroughly and completely . . . wrong.
Let me make it as simple and straightforward as possible (and then I am taking the advice of Joel A. above). It does not matter whether the Jerseys are real or fake. It does not matter that an auction house has decided to list them. It does not matter whether they claim, you claim or anyone claims they will be authenticated. Best of luck in all that.
You came to the board, you asked for opinions and you got them. Now take a moment, breathe deep, be calm, and go back and look at what you wrote when you offered them to the forum. Objectively, did you tell a clear story about how the jerseys were acquired? Did that story remain consistent? Did you answer questions from others clearly? The answer to all of these is no.
My problem is not with the jerseys, the authenticators, or the descriptions. It is with the not so subtle shot at the "whole board" and the direct attack on Eric. (Oh wait, the last few posts suggest that it may not have been a direct attack after all, just a mistake, a misunderstanding, something overheard). You got the benefit of free and extensive opinion, good and bad. You are the better for it.
I respectfully make two suggestions: (1) don't tell a narrative about the jerseys (like "ANOTHER "FIND" OF POSSIBLE GAME USED JERSEYS), just describe the jerseys and post pictures. This will present a decreased potential for ridicule. If povenance becomes an issue later, try to tell a short clear story. (2) Wait at least a half hour before responding to a post that upsets you. I call this a "cooling off period" that allows calm and coherent response.
Best of luck on your auctions, I look forward to the discussion of the items on this board.
I guess I asked for it by posting. However, I found the response absolutely hilarious, particularly the point counterpoint stuff. It amazes me that a simple summary can be dissected so thoroughly and completely . . . wrong.
Let me make it as simple and straightforward as possible (and then I am taking the advice of Joel A. above). It does not matter whether the Jerseys are real or fake. It does not matter that an auction house has decided to list them. It does not matter whether they claim, you claim or anyone claims they will be authenticated. Best of luck in all that.
You came to the board, you asked for opinions and you got them. Now take a moment, breathe deep, be calm, and go back and look at what you wrote when you offered them to the forum. Objectively, did you tell a clear story about how the jerseys were acquired? Did that story remain consistent? Did you answer questions from others clearly? The answer to all of these is no.
My problem is not with the jerseys, the authenticators, or the descriptions. It is with the not so subtle shot at the "whole board" and the direct attack on Eric. (Oh wait, the last few posts suggest that it may not have been a direct attack after all, just a mistake, a misunderstanding, something overheard). You got the benefit of free and extensive opinion, good and bad. You are the better for it.
I respectfully make two suggestions: (1) don't tell a narrative about the jerseys (like "ANOTHER "FIND" OF POSSIBLE GAME USED JERSEYS), just describe the jerseys and post pictures. This will present a decreased potential for ridicule. If povenance becomes an issue later, try to tell a short clear story. (2) Wait at least a half hour before responding to a post that upsets you. I call this a "cooling off period" that allows calm and coherent response.
Best of luck on your auctions, I look forward to the discussion of the items on this board.
Comment