Who's the bigger villian: Rose or Bonds?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tacprc
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 253

    #31
    Re: Who's the bigger villian: Rose or Bonds?

    Did you recently purchase that photo on eBay? I saw one listed there during the past 60 days. Thanks. Chuck

    Comment

    • jwasserman
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2006
      • 279

      #32
      Re: Who's the bigger villian: Rose or Bonds?

      sure did. i was surprised it didn't draw more bidding. it's a really cool piece!

      Originally posted by tacprc
      Did you recently purchase that photo on eBay? I saw one listed there during the past 60 days. Thanks. Chuck
      http://s52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...n/game%20used/
      http://s52.photobucket.com/albums/g28/wassermj/Neshek/

      Comment

      • tacprc
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2008
        • 253

        #33
        Re: Who's the bigger villian: Rose or Bonds?

        OK. Thanks. I wasn't sure that it was real so I didn't bid.

        Comment

        • 4cuda9er
          Member
          • Nov 2005
          • 87

          #34
          Re: Who's the bigger villian: Rose or Bonds?

          Just curious..Do any of the Bonds' haters actually think that the players who held records in the past, had to hit against pitchers that were using roids....???
          I don't condone Bonds for lying about his use, but it is very hard to fine players of his era who not using enhancers, hitters, or pitchers...There are actually retired players, who are admitting to using enhancers when they were playing, and stated that it was common practice. I was able to get one of Bonds 700 series HR Balls hit into the cove, and it made the ball more valuable to me knowing that he hit it off of Franklin, who's name was also included in the roid reports.

          Gary

          Comment

          Working...