O'Keeffe: More Hobby Subpoenas

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RKGIBSON
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2006
    • 581

    #46
    Re: O'Keeffe: More Hobby Subpoenas

    Fair enough, I read it slightly different. At the end of the day with any business, you have your reputation and integrity for customers to make the decision to do business with you. When it comes to football, I do not trust their opinion from their past work. Not just MEARS but all the authenication companies have big problems when it comes to credibility in my opinion. None of their COA's mean anything to me. Authentication companies have been created as a tool to lend credibility to items that can not be done any other way. This is my final post on this subject, and my opinion.

    Roger

    Comment

    • lund6771
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 805

      #47
      Re: O'Keeffe: More Hobby Subpoenas

      Originally posted by Eric
      Roger-
      You were questioning the intent of Grob's column. I am taking it at it's word. You seem to be suggesting that it's to justify Mears' mistakes.

      Grob is saying the opposite. People should HAVE to own up to mistakes. And there should be regulations to force them to because people in the hobby can't seem to do it on their own.
      Eric...the A5 thing is the biggest joke in this hobby...there are TONS of A5 pieces of shit floating around that people actually believe are real because it is a post 1987 something or other

      like Roger said...it's all about the money....would Mears make any $ if they rejected all the A5 crap out there?...of course not, so let's give it an A5 so we can get paid

      grading the Jim Brown an A10 proved to me that it's all about the money

      what people say and do can be completely different

      Comment

      Working...