Clemens to be indicted

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cohibasmoker
    Banned
    • Aug 2005
    • 2379

    #16
    Re: Clemens to be indicted

    Originally posted by Mark17
    That's my point. So, where's the REAL crime? Lying about something while testifying about something that didn't involve a crime in the first place.....

    Isn't this what the term "entrapment" refers to? They use the power of the government to drag him up there, they put him on the spot, where he's going to be humiliated publicly no matter what he says, and then they manufacture THAT into a crime.

    Not liking Clemens or what he did doesn't mean it's okay for Congress to do this to him. Frankly, it's abuse of power. They could call any of us up there to testify regarding something embarrassing in our past, and we either publicly 'fess up, or we get indicted.

    I'm not a Clemens fan but this government is starting to scare me.
    Lying to Congress - now that's a joke in and by itself. trsent - Do we have a say? People are screaming but NO-ONE is listening. Instead, they are telling us what's best for us so just sit back, work hard, pay your taxes and Congress will dictate to you what's best for you.

    But hey, America wanted "Change" and I'd say - we got it.

    Comment

    • slambam
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 124

      #17
      Re: Clemens to be indicted

      Originally posted by Mark17
      How can you respect Pettite for using PEDs? As far as admitting it, he was paying attention to what was happening to the other guys and made a calculated decision to admit it. I have more respect for the lawyer(s) advising him to confess than I do for him.

      Pettite's strategy was better than Clemens', that's all.
      I never said I respected his use of PEDs. I said I respect the fact that he's the only athlete (that I can recall at least) who never denied it once his name came out. He didn't pull a Bonds or Clemens and deny everything, he didn't pull a Big Mac or A-Rod and deny it before admitting it, instead he stepped up and admitted it. People make mistakes, and at least he came out and told the truth. And sure it's a waste of tax dollars, but I think most of our tax dollars go to waste anyway.

      Comment

      • legaleagle92481
        Banned
        • Oct 2009
        • 2538

        #18
        Re: Clemens to be indicted

        Originally posted by slambam
        I never said I respected his use of PEDs. I said I respect the fact that he's the only athlete (that I can recall at least) who never denied it once his name came out. He didn't pull a Bonds or Clemens and deny everything, he didn't pull a Big Mac or A-Rod and deny it before admitting it, instead he stepped up and admitted it. People make mistakes, and at least he came out and told the truth. And sure it's a waste of tax dollars, but I think most of our tax dollars go to waste anyway.
        do you really think andy fully disclosed his use? and what he used? its called admit to something relatively minor so people dont dig and find out the major stuff. he and roger were workout buddies and close friends and his dad was involved in a ped case at a texas gym where incidentally one of andys pals was a trainer and also involved.

        Comment

        • Dach0sen0ne
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 872

          #19
          Re: Clemens to be indicted

          How long ago was Bonds indicted? He still hasn't gone to trial. This could go on for a looooooooonnnnngggggg time.

          Comment

          • cjclong
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2006
            • 936

            #20
            Re: Clemens to be indicted

            When we are taking about Petitte and "PED's" lets be specific. Petitte admitted using HGH , not steroids, and that was to help him recover from an injury. I frankly don't understand why we ban anything for an athlete recovering from an inury. If we complain about it being artificial, why don't we ban Tommy John surgery. That is the most "artifical" thing possible, takng a body part out of your leg and putting it in your arrm. To me using sometning to help recovery from an injury , even if someone used sterodis, is different form using drugs to enhance performance. How is that different from surgery. As far as whether Pettite lied, he has a reputaiton as a truthful man. Apparently his Christain fath is imporant to him That isn't to say that he should be considered a truthful person because he claims to be a Christian. There are plenty of people who claim to be Christians who are obvious liars. But many people who do take their religions serosuly, whether they are Muslims, Hindus, Jewish, etc., take their truth telling obligation seriously. That is why we give the oath to tell the truth before testimony. Of course the oath won't stop a person who is deternined to lie from lying, but it does encourage those who take their religion seriously to tell the truth.

            Comment

            • bscott
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2006
              • 105

              #21
              Re: Clemens to be indicted

              Originally posted by kellsox
              Apparently Clemens brought this upon himself in several ways...

              http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/19/c...ndictment.html

              This Newsweek article gives a brief overview of how the Congressional hearings came to be. Clemens actively sought the spotlight to defend his past.

              Clemens wanted very badly to testify to Congress on as they say, "live, National TV". What kind of person wants to go on TV and deliberately lie to the United States Congress? Nobody put a gun to his head here. He did it to himself. He thought he was above the game. He thought he would get away with it.

              At least McGwire eventually came (somewhat) clean on his past.


              For all the talk of Pete Rose being baseball's biggest Gambler, Roger Clemens certainly deserves an honorable mention in that category. For it was Roger Clemens who took the enormous gamble to fight his steroid allegations by denying and lying. That is basically his defense: Deny, deny, lie, lie. Roger betted on the public swooping in to support him. It was a bad bet.

              It appears that Roger Clemens is about to lose the bet he made with the public, and with Congress.


              The whole mess is quite a shame, for many reasons. In 2004, I saw firsthand a really nice thing Clemens did with his Charity Foundation: he bought an apartment for a single father and his son who was having severe medical issues. It didn't make a huge splash in the Houston papers, but Clemens really did buy the man an apartment, and he showed up to surprise the father and son with the gift, who were, as you may imagine, overjoyed with happiness.

              Even baseball cheaters do nice things.

              Comment

              • rj_lucas
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2009
                • 489

                #22
                Re: Clemens to be indicted

                Originally posted by bscott
                Even baseball cheaters do nice things.
                Unlike the cheaters in Congress, who contribute nothing of value other than bringing down these Dangerous Enemies of the State.

                Rick
                rickjlucas@gmail.com

                Comment

                • Mark17
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2006
                  • 379

                  #23
                  Re: Clemens to be indicted

                  Originally posted by rj_lucas
                  Unlike the cheaters in Congress, who contribute nothing of value other than bringing down these Dangerous Enemies of the State.

                  Rick
                  rickjlucas@gmail.com
                  Rick,
                  Don't you understand? This guy LIED to the esteemed members of Congress!! Is there a worse crime than that?

                  I'm being sarcastic of course... Congress itself is one of the biggest collection of liars ever assebled.

                  Comment

                  • godwulf
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 1864

                    #24
                    Re: Clemens to be indicted

                    Addressing only the HOF question, let's not lose sight of who votes those so honored in: the sports writers. Are those guys likely to look the other way, and pretend that they never heard the confessions, the accusations, the rumors, when the time comes to vote on Bonds, Clemens, ARod, et al? I tend to believe that, as a group, they will not look the other way, and not even BB will find a home in the Hall. What you and I think or want to happen, ultimately, will not mean squat.
                    Jeff
                    godwulf1@cox.net

                    Comment

                    • earlywynnfan
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 1271

                      #25
                      Re: Clemens to be indicted

                      Originally posted by godwulf
                      Addressing only the HOF question, let's not lose sight of who votes those so honored in: the sports writers. Are those guys likely to look the other way, and pretend that they never heard the confessions, the accusations, the rumors, when the time comes to vote on Bonds, Clemens, ARod, et al? I tend to believe that, as a group, they will not look the other way, and not even BB will find a home in the Hall. What you and I think or want to happen, ultimately, will not mean squat.
                      But aren't these the same sportswriters who looked the other way when McGwire went from beanpole to Mack truck? When Bonds' head grew a couple sizes? Where was all the handwringing over the "hallowed records of baseball's past" when Sosa and Mac were knocking down walls? When Clemens, showing the normal effects of age on his career, completely revived his career by "working harder"? (This from a man who worked out 20 hours a day already?)

                      I always wonder why BB writers get a free pass in this whole thing. They were there, in the locker rooms, and never said a word. Now, they bash anyone suspected and throw their morals around. Now they are voting (or not voting) for the same guys they raved about while they were active.

                      Ken
                      earlywynnfan5@hotmail.com

                      Comment

                      Working...