Re: Jeter Not Mvp ?
I'm not saying anybody's ballot should be invalidated. If I had a vote I would look at the years the players had. If one player had clearly out performed the other then that player should win. If a veteran player and a newcomer were essentially tied then I would go with the veteran player. Obviously some of voters didn't use the standard I would or thought that Morneau clearly outperformed Jeter. I don't think that, but its their vote and their decison. Morneau won the award. There is nothing in the rules that says prior service should be considered. That's just my opinion. As I said, others can differ. There have been cases where out of bad judgment or personal anomosity a player who was deserving didn't get a vote. One year when Joe Dimaggio barely edged out Ted Williams for the MVP one voter didn't name Williams at all on his ballot at any level. To have done that almost surrely meant that person disliked Williams. One of the voters put Jeter 6th which seems pretty low. I'm not saying this voter disliked Jeter, but that does seem like a lapse in judgment. To pose a question: Should there be two awards voted by the writers- MVP and Outstanding player. There has always been the question of whether a player on a team that finishes far out of the running can be the MVP. If a team finished last with you, they could finish last without you. In some years the writers might think the Outstanding Player and the MVP were one and the same. In other years different players might win the two awards.
I'm not saying anybody's ballot should be invalidated. If I had a vote I would look at the years the players had. If one player had clearly out performed the other then that player should win. If a veteran player and a newcomer were essentially tied then I would go with the veteran player. Obviously some of voters didn't use the standard I would or thought that Morneau clearly outperformed Jeter. I don't think that, but its their vote and their decison. Morneau won the award. There is nothing in the rules that says prior service should be considered. That's just my opinion. As I said, others can differ. There have been cases where out of bad judgment or personal anomosity a player who was deserving didn't get a vote. One year when Joe Dimaggio barely edged out Ted Williams for the MVP one voter didn't name Williams at all on his ballot at any level. To have done that almost surrely meant that person disliked Williams. One of the voters put Jeter 6th which seems pretty low. I'm not saying this voter disliked Jeter, but that does seem like a lapse in judgment. To pose a question: Should there be two awards voted by the writers- MVP and Outstanding player. There has always been the question of whether a player on a team that finishes far out of the running can be the MVP. If a team finished last with you, they could finish last without you. In some years the writers might think the Outstanding Player and the MVP were one and the same. In other years different players might win the two awards.
Comment