Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
Collapse
X
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
No problem mvandor, I am just a really funny guy and I can't handle someone not laughing(more humor). I just thought with all the hatin' going on in other threads, I would take a stab at humor. Anyways, back to the original topic of this thread, I would have to agree with ol' Jack on this one. It appears he NEVER wore short sleeves!
Todd RicksTodd Ricks
www.freewebs.com/canseco44
Always looking for Canseco Game Used Items
Spideyman79@yahoo.comComment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
I'm sure there is a reason why Lambert always wore sleeves and he would remember that. Maybe he didn't like the way they fit. Who knows. Gretzky may believe he has all of his gamers, but who knows what happened when they were in the possession of the equipment manager or other team employees.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
stupid me, i just realized the lambert jersey is the one that just sold in the mastro auction for $3500:
so lambert contacted them, told them the jersey wasn't good and they refused to pull it. nice. to mastro's credit they did include a stylematch (as per their announcement that all jerseys in their auction have been "painstakingly photomatched") and here's their photo/stylematch:
for those who think i'm kidding, that's really it. painstaking indeed.
not sure if that million dollar advance that they paid on the football collection influenced things. anyway, i know their authenticators are a big secret and don't want to be associated with their work and mastro apparently doesn't want to be associated with them, but one look at that LOA they posted and the unique prose screams sweet lou lampson. in the very first paragraph lou launches one into the grandstands and clears the bases:
"Lambert was a "long sleeve" guy for the majority of his career, save for perhaps the final year ('84) or two ('83). Colleagues have suggested that pictures exist from very late career of Lambert with short sleeves, and, but the point here is that the sleeves were cut and hemmed, probably after game use for potential use in off season mini camps, informal workouts, and even training camp"
wow. did those suggestive colleagues manage to produce even a single pic or did they just keep it all to suggestions? i can't do even do lou's letters justice. reading them brings me almost as much joy as watching tina fey do sarah palin. anyway, the LOA is posted. lou, in typical lampson fashion, states it's not an ideal lambert, but "acceptable nonetheless". (isn't everything?). anyway, there's no way that LOA is anyone but lampson so i guess now we know who mastro uses and it's not surprising they refuse to put his name on the items. i imagine lou doesn't even want to be associated with his work anymore.
rudy.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
is it the same lambert that's been pinging around the hobby from broadway rick to vintage to GFC?
rudy.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
heck, mears might have graded this thing out at an a10 given a) the lack of game photo evidence b) the fact that other steelers players were known to have worn short sleeves and c) it's clear lambert sported short sleeves while at kent. on the other hand mears might have also deducted a point or two for excessive wear - i mean what collector wants to see repairs made to a jersey?
btw you gotta love how lampson (presumably) has massaged the lot description each time out. when it was listed at vintage, it was a game jersey and the sleeves had been chopped because of hot game time weather. when it was listed at mastro, it became a practice jersey and the sleeves had been chopped for use during "informal workouts" and the like. beautiful.
vintage authentics:
"... sleeves have been custom cut and hemmed perhaps in anticipation of a warm weather game."
mastro:
"...sleeves were cut and hemmed, probably after game use for potential use in off season mini camps, informal workouts, and even training camp."
the level of enthusiasm over the jersey's game use was also tempered by the time it hit mastro:
vintage authentics:
"Overall the game use evidence is solid and consistent throughout leading this quality gamer to a final high authentic grade of 9 - as nice a Lambert as you'll find."
mastro:
"The wear appears consistent and solid but not great... It could have a lot more wear, but it is his final season when he only played eight games... an acceptable representation from a final season."
wow from a "high authentic grade of 9" to an "acceptable representation"? good grief.
Originally posted by kingjammy24to mastro's credit they did include a stylematch (as per their announcement that all jerseys in their auction have been "painstakingly photomatched") and here's their photo/stylematch... for those who think i'm kidding, that's really it. painstaking indeed.
from the final game of lambert's career:
.....
robertComment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
when i mentioned that the mastro "stylematch" photo had been cropped, i may not have been clear. the photo below shows how much of the original photo was excluded from the mastro lot description, everything below the red line. mysteriously the top, left and right edges of the original photo were not cropped, just the bottom. innocent occurrence? you be the judge...
...robertComment
-
Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
...robertComment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
You know, you try and give Lou and the auction houses the benefit of the doubt, but when you see auction houses refusing to pull a jersey on the actual player's say so where a clearcut issue is involved like this, mysteriously cropped pics to support an item, and obvious fantasy in item descriptions and LOA's, you really have to wonder what it takes to get a prosecution for fraud in this friggin' country anymore.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
lambert's website says that they notified mastro last spring about a short-sleeved lambert jersey they were running at that time. according to lambert's website mastro "..cited a 'third-party authenticator' had given their blessings as they pertained to the authenticity of the Lambert jersey based upon a data base that was consistent with jerseys worn by Ted Hendricks and Earl Campbell....When we informed the auction house that Jack never, EVER wore short sleeves during any NFL game, they argued that we were incorrect...The sale of this "game used" jersey went as planned to the tune of more than $15,000...So now the same auction house has presented yet another "game used" Jack Lambert jersey for auction".
given that the photo is from the mastro auction that just ended, the post is obviously recent. last spring (spring of 2007), MEARS was still under contract with mastro. i have an email in to dave grob to find out if MEARS authenticated a short-sleeved lambert for mastro sometime around last spring.
lambert's rep seemed pretty certain even going so far as to say there's a very specific reason why lambert never wore short sleeves. yet if you look at the mastro (lampson) loa, lou's not nearly as certain, stating that lambert "perhaps" wore long sleeves. the idea that his colleagues suggested photos exist is laughable because they apparently weren't able to produce a single one of those photos. so his expert colleagues saw rare photos of lambert wearing short sleeves and not a single one of them managed to procure one of these photos? horsepuckey. any decent collector (or authenticator) would have a massive photo library and upon stumbling upon such photos of lambert wearing short sleeves would obviously add the photos to their library knowing what a huge find it is to have even a single pic showing lambert wearing short sleeves in an NFL game.
anyway, about 80% of the lampsons LOA is a defense that tries to justify all of the jerseys anomalies and inconsistencies. it's similar to when lou read robert's analysis of the blanda helmet and then spent his entire LOA countering every point. the jersey's so good that it needs to be defended vigorously. in typical lou style, there are red flags but he casts them all aside and says the jerseys is "acceptable nonetheless". i'm guessing that if mastro sold a short-sleeved lambert last spring for over $15,000 and this one sold for a paltry $3500 then apparently it wasn't acceptable to most bidders.
re: the cropping of the photo.
i suspected as much. the photo suspiciously ended right at the sleeves. golly, what could they be trying to hide? how is a photo of lambert wearing a long-sleeved shirt supposed to be a "photomatch" for a short-sleeved shirt? only in doug allen's wacky world of photomatching, where a photomatch isn't really a photomatch and many times it's not even a stylematch. painstaking!
rudy.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
lambert's website says that they notified mastro last spring about a short-sleeved lambert jersey they were running at that time. according to lambert's website mastro "..cited a 'third-party authenticator' had given their blessings as they pertained to the authenticity of the Lambert jersey based upon a data base that was consistent with jerseys worn by Ted Hendricks and Earl Campbell....When we informed the auction house that Jack never, EVER wore short sleeves during any NFL game, they argued that we were incorrect...The sale of this "game used" jersey went as planned to the tune of more than $15,000...So now the same auction house has presented yet another "game used" Jack Lambert jersey for auction".
given that the photo is from the mastro auction that just ended, the post is obviously recent. last spring (spring of 2007), MEARS was still under contract with mastro. i have an email in to dave grob to find out if MEARS authenticated a short-sleeved lambert for mastro sometime around last spring.
lambert's rep seemed pretty certain even going so far as to say there's a very specific reason why lambert never wore short sleeves. yet if you look at the mastro (lampson) loa, lou's not nearly as certain, stating that lambert "perhaps" wore long sleeves. the idea that his colleagues suggested photos exist is laughable because they apparently weren't able to produce a single one of those photos. so his expert colleagues saw rare photos of lambert wearing short sleeves and not a single one of them managed to procure one of these photos? horsepuckey. any decent collector (or authenticator) would have a massive photo library and upon stumbling upon such photos of lambert wearing short sleeves would obviously add the photos to their library knowing what a huge find it is to have even a single pic showing lambert wearing short sleeves in an NFL game.
anyway, about 80% of the lampsons LOA is a defense that tries to justify all of the jerseys anomalies and inconsistencies. it's similar to when lou read robert's analysis of the blanda helmet and then spent his entire LOA countering every point. the jersey's so good that it needs to be defended vigorously. in typical lou style, there are red flags but he casts them all aside and says the jerseys is "acceptable nonetheless". i'm guessing that if mastro sold a short-sleeved lambert last spring for over $15,000 and this one sold for a paltry $3500 then apparently it wasn't acceptable to most bidders.
re: the cropping of the photo.
i suspected as much. the photo suspiciously ended right at the sleeves. golly, what could they be trying to hide? how is a photo of lambert wearing a long-sleeved shirt supposed to be a "photomatch" for a short-sleeved shirt? only in doug allen's wacky world of photomatching, where a photomatch isn't really a photomatch and many times it's not even a stylematch. painstaking!
rudy.
The 1984 Jack Lambert Jersey Offered by Mastro
December 17 2008 at 11:03 AM Dave Grob
In response to an e-mail:
dave
did mears authenticate a short-sleeved jack lambert
steelers shirt for mastro some time around last spring?
thanks,
rudy
------------
My response:
Rudy,
How do I answer this? If I tell you that this information is available to you and any one else who wishes to be a MEARS Member, I will railed for blowing you off or assumed to be hiding something. I will answer this your question this time as it is fundamentally unfair to MEARS Members to do so in the future.
We did not look at the 1984 home jersey that appears to be of current debate. There is a Jack Lambert ROAD jersey from 1983 in the data base that had the sleeves "cut short" and left un-hemmed. 1.5 points were taken off for this and the comments for this evaluation include:
"The images we referenced were from 1983 and showed Lambert wearing long sleeves. The sleeves are trimmed with the reason and/or purpose of their shortening unknown."
As I mentioned above, please do not ask again for this type of information for the reasons stated as I will not provide it.
v/r
DaveComment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
while mears didn't examine the recent '84 lambert jersey that is being discussed, dave's warm and friendly reply suggests that they did examine this one:
the '83 jersey shown above closed in spring of 2007 but sold for only $8,354. lambert's site references one sold by mastro in spring 2007 that sold for more than $15k. how many short-sleeved lamberts could mastro have auctioned off? anyway, apparently on the '83 mears mentioned the sleeves and deducted points for them but that info didn't seem to make its way to the description. not sure how it rated an 8.5 but there you have it. was mears the "third-party authenticator" who refused to budge when confronted by lambert's rep? it's possible given the reasoning, cited by lambert's rep, that it "matched their database" and the comparisons to irrrelevant examples that appear to be mears' hallmarks. then again, to find out for sure i'd probably have to fork over $40.
rudy.Comment
-
Re: Jack Lambert game worn jersey....
Originally posted by Dave grobWe did not look at the 1984 home jersey that appears to be of current debate. There is a Jack Lambert ROAD jersey from 1983 in the data base that had the sleeves "cut short" and left un-hemmed. 1.5 points were taken off for this and the comments for this evaluation include...
as far as dave stating "...please do not ask again for this type of information for the reasons stated as I will not provide it." - i just don't get it nor do i understand why responding to such a question would be "unfair" to mears members. i would think mears would be eager and willing to respond fully to any questions regarding an item thought to have been evaluated by their team - especially given mears' past relationship with mastro. but, hey, what do i know?
btw do any of you jersey experts find anything odd about the letter spacing found on the short sleeve lambert shirt being discussed? as i've mentioned before, i know zilch about jerseys but i noticed that the letters appear to be spaced much farther apart in game photos when compared to the '84 ss road jersey in quesion. photos a&b are game photos, photo c is a long sleeve road gamer sold at auction (letter spacing is consistent with game photos), and photo d shows two shots of the short sleeve '84 road shirt.
...
robertComment
Comment