Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
Now that I think about it, I feel a bit differently about World Series jerseys. Although my Bagwell has a solid photomatch, I sure wish it had MLB Authentication as well. However, in this case, when given the choice between a photomatch and a hologram, I would take the former.
The hologram lends credence, but it's not the be-all and end-all. Especially if it's issued, since some teams added WS patches to all their jerseys. The Astros didn't do that, but still...I like what the Rangers did with their 2011 WS shirts. They tagged the ones with use as game used right after the game.
-
Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
When I buy jerseys for my Bagwell collection, the first thing I do is look for a photomatch. If I can't find one, then I refrain from buying the shirt. However, if it had an Astros' team letter, that would factor into my decision but wouldn't be the deciding factor like a photomatch would. This is the case with my collecting Bagwell, who played from 1991 through 2005.
However, if I can get a jersey of a contemporary player, then the first thing I look for is MLB authentication. Yeah, it's not a 100 percent guarantee, but I feel pretty comfortable with items with both the issued and used MLB holograms. If it comes directly from the team, I have a great amount of trust in that. Such is the case with my Mariners' jerseys and hats.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
i think COA's are pretty worthless.......give me a photomatch any dayLeave a comment:
-
Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
I Collect mainly Football Jerseys of present day players and unfortunately I fall into the camp of your buyer. I will only collect Jerseys from a small handful of originators and rarely anything without a COA. I always try to match stains, logos, numbers etc. for further confirmation.
I also agree with the value argument. IMO, A present day football Jersey without paperwork seems to sell for at least 3x less than a well documented jersey.
I wasn't always like this.....I've just been screwed so many times by forgers its just the way it is now. Forgers also specialize in COAs so you need to be extra careful in viewing the paperwork.
That being said, you can't have It both ways by saying you are an interested buyer, but want it for less because it has no paperwork?Leave a comment:
-
Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
I know! This joker is messaging me because he wants an item I have but my price is high, so he proceeds to tell me my item is fake and not worth as much because there is no LOA/COA?! Even though I have photos matching the bat! Any way it's just funny.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
If I could fake wear and doctor a jersey to look game worn, what would stop me from typing a letter claiming it was real?
Considering how many dealers have been outed as frauds, a photomatch is the only validation of authenticityLeave a comment:
-
Thoughts on COA's/LOA's vs Photomatches....
Hello all,
I just want to get your thoughts on the above. I have a guy who claims he is a collector, but that if an item doesn't have an LOA/COA then it is worthless (even with a photomatch).
I have tried to explain that anyone can make a LOA/COA easier than doctoring an item and that there are plenty of COA's/LOA's that are erroneous!
I just couldn't believe the ridiculousness of this individual!
Leave a comment: