103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tmpjets
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    As for Mariners fans let us just pray that Arod only used in Texas and this dosen't come back to Seattle to haunt us. The last thing I would want is my childhood stars get put on the list too; I mean come on Griffey,Edgar,Randy , and Buhner. Dear GOD MAN THE MADNESS!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Originally posted by thomecollector
    I doubt that Thome would be on the list . He has been a big boy for most
    of his life. His whole family is a group of big guys. His old man is a softball legend in Illinois. Besides, His dad would kick his @$$.........
    thomecollector,

    Do I ever hope you are right. I have ALWAYS liked Jim Thome.

    And the same goes for Frank Thomas. I sincerely hope he's a clean guy, because he's always been a monster of a man too, so maybe it's just a genetic thing there too.

    But after the Rodriguez debacle......NOTHING would surprise me.

    What would really be the final screw in my believing coffin would be to find out that Ken Griffey Jr.'s name was on the list. That would sinch the deal for me to start liquadating my entire "current day" collection. He has always been one of the top greats in the history of the game, a tremendous 5-tool player with the likes of Mays.

    PLEASE Griffey.......don't be on that list!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • flaco1801
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    ill never forget when i saw lenny dykstra in a spring trianing game. they said he gained some weight, heck he didnt even look the same. that was my first exposure, tho i didnt know it at the time

    Leave a comment:


  • OaklandAsFan
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    sheff already admitted to using at the least HGH in an SI article when he was working out with Bonds (good read if you want to see how wacked out Barroid really is)

    I HIGHLY doubt Frank Thomas ever used steroids.

    Leave a comment:


  • arl423
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    I would be most dissapointed to find out that Albert Pujols, Nolan Ryan or Cal Ripken Jr used. Along with a few others but those would be my top 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • notxpensv4u
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    The most disappointed player I would be upset with would be Cal Ripken Jr. If he ever tested positive it would be a sad day for baseball. Also has anyone brought up the fact in the news it seems kinda funny that las week the heat was on Barry Bonds and his use. Why out of the blue AROD's name is brought up. Why not wait until the regular season? Don't forget Bonds trial is March 2nd.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingi79
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    I'll give you a better question, what player would you be most disappointed in if they used performance enhancers?

    I'd go with John Smoltz, Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine and Chipper Jones.

    If any of these 4 come up with a positive, I'd done with baseball. I don't mean it as a knee jerk reaction, I mean Baseball will no longer exist to me. If you see their names, everything I have will suddenly be for sale and cheap. (I am sure some people are no anxiously awaiting these positives lol)

    I would laugh the hardest if David Eckstein came up positive. I'd believe the San Diego Chicken used steroids purchased from the Philly Phanatic first.

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Originally posted by 5kRunner
    My thoughts exactly.

    I don't think Frank Thomas juiced. Wasn't he one of the players pushing for testing before the league even discussed it?
    It's a brilliant cover-up, reverse psychology JK

    Leave a comment:


  • 5kRunner
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Originally posted by chakes89
    If Corey Patterson was jucing, he obviously wasn't doing something right
    My thoughts exactly.

    I don't think Frank Thomas juiced. Wasn't he one of the players pushing for testing before the league even discussed it?

    Leave a comment:


  • chakes89
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    If Corey Patterson was jucing, he obviously wasn't doing something right

    Leave a comment:


  • Lokee
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Albert (don't call me Joey) Belle.

    Leave a comment:


  • notxpensv4u
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Luis Gonzalez 57 homeruns in 2001
    and who could forget the power hitter
    Shawn Green 49 Homeruns in 2001
    followed by
    Todd Helton 49 homeruns in 2001
    all who seemed to go into history as power hitters?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr.3000
    Guest replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Originally posted by otismalibu
    Lance Armstrong.

    What position does he play and who drafted him?


    Leave a comment:


  • otismalibu
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Lance Armstrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3arod13
    replied
    Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

    Originally posted by schubert1970
    How about Brady Anderson??? That guy from the O's.....
    Hit 50 HR's in 1996. Next highest in his career was 24 in in 1999.

    Leave a comment:

Working...